We think that's the best way to describe what the guys at Fudzilla did, because it doesn't resemble your average hardware review. For example, you only get one graph where comparisons are rendered (for the Sandra test), so let's see what it's all about.
Lame encoding performance: 4.7x and 6.8x (without and with multithreading); as a point of reference, you can consider that a Celeron 220 (1.2 GHz) reaches 11.3x. SuperPi 32M takes a little bit more than an hour and a quarter (no comparison is given here, but you should be resourceful enough to find out how slow that is). Sandra's FPU test, on a Celeron 420 (1.6 GHz) is twice as fast, and we can say the same about the ALU.
You may add to this scarce data the "incredibly" bad impression that running Cinebench on this processor gave to them. The Windows XP installation took more than normal, too (with the decompressing stage being guilty for the delay).
Link: Fudzilla.
TrackBack URI for this entry
Subscribe to this comment's feed
Show/Hide comments
Show/Hide comment form
